Coronavirus – MPs' using additional budget

Request

  1. Which (if any) of the 6 County Durham MP's (Dehenna Davison; Mary Foy; Richard Holden; Paul Howell; Kevan Jones and Grahame Morris) claimed the allowance of 'up to £10,000'; which was made available to them to help with additional expenditure during the Covid 19 pandemic.

  2. Relating to the same MP's: Who (if any) employs a relative or family member within their staff and what remuneration is paid to those relatives or family members, of those who do so.


Response

I can confirm that we hold information relevant to your request.

At the start of the lockdown in March 2020, IPSA made the decision to increase MPs’ office costs’ budget to support the move to homeworking for their staff members. The £10,000 was added to the existing office costs’ budget and subject to the same rules. Any amounts left over at the end of March 2020 were made available to individual MPs in their 2020-21 budgets. All amounts claimed by MPs are published, in line with IPSA’s schedule of publication, normally four or five months after being processed. IPSA will also be publishing the details of MPs’ budgets as part of its annual publication in December 2020, which will show the total amounts spent in the 2019-20 year. As the £10,000 allowance as split between financial years, total expenditure in the 2020-21 financial year is not due to be published until December 2021.

The information relating to the budgets for the last financial year is therefore subject to a Refusal Notice under section 22(1) of FOIA, because it is intended for future publication. Section 22(1) is a qualified exemption and requires us to consider the public interest test. MPs have a certain amount of time in which to submit their claims, and this period has been extended due to the pandemic. Submitted claims then undergo a period of validation and reconciliation before being published. While we may hold some information on claims from the budgets for the current financial year, these will be incomplete and also subject to validation and reconciliation.

In the light of the validation and reconciliation procedure and because IPSA already has a schedule of routinely publishing this information, I find that the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosure at this time.

To answer your second question I must first explain that IPSA defines family members and relatives as “connected parties”. This term is defined in The Scheme of MPs’ Business Costs and Expenses and includes, “a body corporate, a firm or a trust with which the MP is connected, as defined in section 252 of the Companies Act 2006.” When an MP employs a “connected party” then this information is included on the web page for that MP, under Other Financial Information, Connected party payroll information.

The pages for each MP can be found on our website.

This information is therefore subject to a Refusal Notice under section 21 of FOIA. Because the information is reasonably accessibly by other means.

Ref:
RFI-202009-10
Disclosure:
2 October 2020
Categories:
COVID-19MPs' OFFICE COSTS
Exemptions Applied:
Section 21, Section 22